I am using a HP iPaq hx2795 WM5 with bluetooth Qstarz Q1000 GPS. This has been a great combination for me.

I tried the new version out on some brief runs today. It works much better when moving at speed. The GPS location point is removed from the last track point. The actual location does not wait for the tracking redraw, which is where it would fall so far behind, previously. This was not a problem before on foot, nor with Tracking Options Threshold set for the type of travel to be encountered (larger distances for higher speeds).

I did not experience any tracks off by hundreds of feet, but I did experience some anomalies:

I noticed that with 10' x 10 sec set, my assumption being that BCN will mark triggered by the first occurrence of either of the two, that now we seemed to miss some marks in the track. Less granularity at speed. With 10x10 set, some distances, maybe 250' at 50 mph, were drawn with straight lines, where I thought they should have been shaped more gradually and curved. These may have been 10 sec intervals, I didn't monitor that closely. Even following a removal and reload of the track from map, these "shortcuts" seemed persistent. I haven't had a chance to look at the data, but I assume it is in there. There something in there causing this, or I am triggering a track point with the greater of 10' or 10 sec (just taking a stab at the problem.)

Just providing feedback. For me,it works fine in most applications. I do not use it for driving, but I might for off-road motorcycling in the future.

Thanks!  Andy